Commentary found in this blog does not necessarily represent the views and opinions of the national setting of the United Church of Christ, its Conferences and Associations, its local churches or its member organizations.
UCC, Interfaith Leaders Speak Out Against Stupak Amendment To Health Care Bill
Posted by:
Rev. Chuck Currie on
November 16, 2009 at
9:38PM EST
Today religious leaders spoke out for a women's right to make her own health care choices. Check out the press release from the Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice:
Washington, DC - Heads of Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, interfaith and First Amendment organizations today called on the Senate to ensure the final health care reform bill respects diverse religious beliefs.
“It is now up to the Senate to keep health care reform free of religious doctrine and restrictions that will prevent women from making their own reproductive health care choices,” said Reverend Dr. Carlton W. Veazey, President and CEO of the Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice (RCRC), which convened today’s news conference.
RCRC includes more than 40 denominations and religious organizations that respect diverse religious beliefs and individual decisions about whether and when to have children. The participating organizations together represent more than 10,000 religious leaders and millions of people of faith who believe that abortion must be safe, legal and accessible.
“We speak as people of faith who support religious freedom and reproductive options,” said Reverend Veazey. “Women must not lose access to abortion services they may need because of a small but vocal group of anti-choice activists.”
Speakers included Linda Bales Todd of the General Board of Church and Society of the United Methodist Church; Sammie Moshenberg, Director of the Washington Office of the National Council of Jewish Women; Jon O’Brien, President of Catholics for Choice; Sandra Sorensen, Director of the Washington Office of the United Church of Christ Justice and Witness Ministries, and Reverend Barry W. Lynn, Executive Director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State.
Data from a public opinion poll of registered voters done by the Mellman Group for the Women Donors Network and Communications Consortium Media Center in late August was released. They showed significant support across religions for the more moderate Capps Amendment to maintain the status quo.
“There should be no Stupak-Pitts language in the Senate or conference committee health care bills,” Reverend Veazey said. “Health care reform is about expanding access to health care for all, not rolling back women’s access to needed health services.”
The statement from Sandra Sorensen, Director of the Washington Office of the United Church of Christ Justice and Ministires, is below:
The United Church of Christ joins many other faith groups in applauding the House version of health care reform which was passed on November 7, 2009, as a good step towards providing affordable health care for more Americans. However, we join with those same groups in expressing our disappointment that the House bowed to pressure exerted at the last minute from anti-abortion lobbyists by attaching the Stupak Amendment to the bill. This amendment would bar any of the health care plans grouped under a public option from covering abortion even when those funds are privately sourced.
The UCC has for 40 years supported the full range of reproductive health care for women, including access to abortion. And yet, once again, women’s health and well-being have been compromised away in the halls of Congress. We call upon the pro-choice leadership in the House and Senate to boldly stand up for women’s reproductive health care rights and join the majority of religious Americans who believe that decisions around the termination of a pregnancy are a private matter between a woman and her physician.
Posted by: Jeff Fairchild on November 16, 2009 10:58PM EST
Chuck, "The UCC" as a whole hasn't supported anything one way or another with regarding abortion. Certain settings have. For someone who repeatedly mispreresents the polity of the UCC, you have a lot of nerve pointing your finger at someone else in the UCC and calling them a liar.
Posted by: Richard on November 17, 2009 1:01AM EST
"Make sure your voice is heard in this debate."
Thanks for the encouragement. Wanna help us out? I have some suggestions for you and the blog at the end.
I agree with the guy above- Here we go again with someone in the national setting deciding that they not only get to speak for the whole denomination, they get to re-write history.
As Sandra Sorensen well knows, and (so do you, Chuck) "The UCC" didn't join anybody in applauding the House bill on Health Care, and "The UCC" hasn't supported anything for 40 years- except, of course, Congregational autonomy in worship and beliefs, unity in Christ-- and, Oh yeah-- a polity that doesn't allow anybody in the UCC to pretend they speak for the denomination on anything.
Given that this is a news blog, how about a serious look at the news. I'll give you the Headline and leads:
Sudden Rash of Abuse of Covenantal Relationships Breaks Out in UCC National Settings
-Director of Washington Based J&W Ministries decides to speak for the Denomination-states The UCC is pleased by Congressional Bill, displeased by amendment.
-Local Church Ministries decrees-- UCC Church renewal and new church starts to be outsourced to independent progressive agency serving the Progressive Church
-UCC President tells Cleveland Plain Dealer --UCC is a Progressive Denomination
Posted by: Albert W. on December 2, 2009 8:57PM EST
I agree with both comments above - and an apology is in order from Sandra Sorenson, who dares to say she speaks for us in the UCC. ... Certainly not for me!!! ... PA Gov. Bob Casey's point, that states don't have to pay for abortions, was confirmed by a Supreme Court decision. ... The fact is, most Americans don't want to pay for abortions either. ... Many of these are wanted by women who have had multiple abortions! Even 5 or 10! ... I am Prochoice before conception and Prolife after conception. The amendment protects the unborn child's right to life, fundamental among America's inherent rights. Rep. Pitts is a good Presbyterian, like many of this nation's Founders, and good for America. I am proud of his courageous stand. - Rev. Albert W. Kovacs, UCC
Moving beyond who speaks for whom in the UCC, there is much on the UCC website supporting the proposition that a woman should have a right to choose. I have found nothing on the website, however, that even hints at the possibility that anyone on the UCC payroll has published any thoughts on how a pregnant woman should exercise this right. Under what circumstances does our still-speaking God tell us it is right to abort a pregnancy? Under what circumstances does our still-speaking God tell us it is wrong? General Synod and JWM have "prophetically" taken positions on a wide range of subjects, including supporting a single-payer national health plan for all, opposing private Social Security accounts, supporting amendments to NAFTA, and opposing (I am not making this up) munitions made with depleted uranium. Faith calls organs of the UCC to express views on matters such as these, but that same faith somehow leaves Synod and our covenanted ministries silent on the fundamental moral issue in the abortion debate, which is not: Should abortion be legal? It is, rather: Under what circumstances is a legal abortion the morally appropriate choice? (There are lots of choices in life that most of us would view as immoral, or at least wrong, that are not illegal.) Have I missed something?